This commit adds (maybe unstable) support for Mastodons v1 api
also some v2 endpoints, maybe I miss stuff, I dont know.
We will need to test this but it should be kinda stable
and work like (old) butter.
Co-authored-by: Natty <natty.sh.git@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: cutls <web-pro@cutls.com>
* reuse single meId parameter
* unify code style
Use template string to avoid having to use escaped quote marks.
* fix: follower only notes are visible to mentioned users
This synchronizes the visibility rules with the Notes.isVisibleForMe
method from packages/backend/src/models/repositories/note.ts
* add comment
* remove unnecessary if
`Array.prototype.some` already returns a boolean so an if to return
true or false is completely unnecessary in this case.
* perf: use count instead of find
When using `count` instead of `findOneBy`, the data is not
unnecessarily loaded.
* remove duplicate null check
The variable is checked for null in the lines above and the function
returns if so. Therefore, it can not be null at this point.
* simplify `getJsonSchema`
Because the assigned value is `null` and the used keys are only
shallow, use of `nestedProperty.set` seems inappropriate. Because the
value is not read, the initial for loop can be replaced by a `for..in`
loop.
Since all keys will be assigned `null`, the condition of the ternary
expression in the nested function will always be true. Therefore the
recursion case will never happen. With this the nested function can be
eliminated.
* remove duplicate condition
The code above already checks `dragging` and returns if it is truthy.
Checking it again later is therefore unnecessary.
To make this more obvious the `return` is removed in favour of using
an if...else construct.
* remove impossible "unknown" time
The `ago` variable will always be a number and all non-negative numbers
are already covered by other cases, the negative case is handled with
`future` so there is no case when `unkown` could be achieved.
Misskey does not know if two remote users are following each other.
Because ActivityPub actions would otherwise fail on followers only
notes, we have to assume that two remote users are following each other
when an interaction about a remote note occurs.
Laura Hausmann
